Making Advocacy Legible: Predictions for Shifts Defining 2026

---

Customer advocacy rarely changes all at once. It evolves quietly, usually in response to pressure elsewhere in the business. Sales cycles stretch. Buyers grow more skeptical. Teams are asked to do more with less. Over time, the way customer trust is surfaced and applied has to adjust.

Is this year one of those inflection points? It kind of feels like one.

Not because advocacy is suddenly more important than it was before, but because the conditions around it are making its weaknesses and its potential easier to see. The organizations that get ahead won’t be the ones that build louder advocacy motions. These will be the ones that make advocacy easier to put into practice.

From Activity to Influence

For a long time, advocacy has benefited from broad agreement. Everyone wants it. Everyone supports it. Fewer people, however, can clearly describe how it affects outcomes.

Is this the year when that vagueness starts to narrow? Not in an adversarial way, but in a practical one?

Leaders want to understand where advocacy shows up in the business and what changes when it does, right? That doesn’t mean advocacy needs perfect attribution models or airtight revenue math, but it does mean the conversation will shift from activity to influence.

Teams that can articulate advocacy’s role in buying confidence, deal velocity, or expansion timing won’t just defend their programs. They’ll embed them more deeply into how the business operates.

AI Becomes Normal and Then Pulls Back

No conversation about the year ahead would be complete without AI. And yet, this may be the a year where AI stops being the headline and starts becoming the background, when it comes to customer advocacy.

Is AI fully established in advocacy workflows? In many (and increasing everyday) ways, yes.

Teams are already using it to summarize calls, extract themes and quotes, draft content, integrate tools, and surface patterns that would have been impossible to see manually. That foundation isn’t going away, nor should it. Anyone out there want to go back to the days of transcribing calls by ear?

What is changing is the expectation that AI can replace the human core of advocacy. That assumption is starting to retreat, and rightfully so. Trust, nuance, and judgment don’t scale cleanly, and advocacy sits squarely at that intersection.

This year, the most effective use of AI won’t be generative bravado: it will be selective support, helping teams move faster, see clearer, and focus more of their energy on relationship-driven work that can’t be automated.

AI will still be present. It just won’t be pretending to lead.

The Expansion of Advocacy Platforms and the End of Tool Scarcity

A few years ago, advocacy teams worked around limitations. Reference management was fragmented. Workstreams lived in spreadsheets, inboxes, and tribal knowledge. Tooling lagged behind ambition. To say that’s no longer the case is stating it very, very lightly.

Is this the year when customer advocacy finally has more technology than it knows what to do with? Possibly.

The market has seen a rapid emergence of advocacy platforms and reference management systems, each promising better access to customers, smoother workflows, and clearer visibility into engagement. I can’t say this emphatically enough, but this isn’t just vendor noise: it’s a signal that advocacy is being recognized as an operational function, not an ad hoc motion.

More tools won’t automatically produce better advocacy results, though. It’s actually the opposite: abundance is more likely to force discipline. Teams will have to decide what they’re actually trying to enable, not just what they can now automate. The advantage will go to programs that use platforms to reduce friction and dependency, not simply to capture more activity.

Credibility Over Polish in Customer Stories

Will highly produced case studies still matter? Yes. Will they do all the work? No.

The stories that resonate most this year will be the ones buyers recognize themselves in. Not ideal outcomes, but credible ones. Stories that include what surprised a customer, what slowed them down, and what they had to figure out along the way.

Advocacy teams that make room for this kind of honesty may find the stories feel less finished internally, but they’ll travel further externally.

Advocacy as a Shared Capability

Advocacy’s role inside organizations will continue to broaden, even if its resources don’t.

Sales will look for faster proof. Marketing will look for credibility. Customer Success will look for expansion leverage. Product will look for real-world context. The question isn’t whether advocacy can support all of this, but whether it can do so by remaining housed within the Marketing function.

The programs that scale will design advocacy so it can move independently through the organization. Less gatekeeping. More enablement.

Community and Advocacy Find Their Proper Distance

Is this the year when community and advocacy move closer together without fully merging? My Magic 8-ball says “It is certain!”

Community creates connection. Advocacy creates influence. Strong communities can surface advocates. Strong advocacy programs can activate trust; treating the two as interchangeable tends to weaken both.

Clarity here matters more than consolidation; clients we work with increasingly see these as band members, not a single lead singer.

What to Do Now

As we look toward 2026, the work ahead is making customer advocacy more legible, moving away from treating it as something that’s activated on demand, and instead toward designing it as something that’s simply there, at the ready.

2026 also means being more deliberate about tools. The growth of customer advocacy platforms and the normalization of AI should reduce effort, not add complexity. Tooling will mature in the background. Customer Advocacy Platforms (CAPs) or Reference Management Systems (RMSs) will feel less like new categories and more like basic infrastructure.

The teams that benefit most this year will be those that simplify workflows, standardize how proof is shared, and are clear about what should remain human-led. Not everything needs to be automated, and not everything should be.

The organizations that get this right won’t talk about advocacy more next year.

They’ll simply find it working in more places, more naturally, and with more staying power.

---